Fasted Cardio vs Fed Cardio – What’s More Effective for Fat Loss?

Cardio training is a staple for those seeking to improve their cardiovascular health, athletic performance, and body composition. One debate that frequently arises in the fitness community is whether performing cardio in a fasted state (typically first thing in the morning before eating) is more effective for fat loss than doing it in a fed state (after consuming food). This article will explore the scientific evidence behind both approaches and analyze whether one truly holds a superior advantage for fat loss.

Source: Photo courtesy of CrossFit Inc.

What is Fasted Cardio?

Fasted cardio refers to cardiovascular exercise performed after a prolonged period without food, usually 8-12 hours, such as in the morning before breakfast. In this state, insulin levels are low, and the body is believed to rely more on stored fat as a fuel source due to reduced availability of glycogen.

What is Fed Cardio?

Fed cardio involves performing cardiovascular exercise after consuming a meal, which raises insulin levels and provides readily available glucose for energy. The rationale is that exercising in this state may allow for better performance and higher training intensities due to increased energy availability.

The Physiology Behind Fat Metabolism

To understand the debate, it’s essential to understand how the body metabolizes energy during cardio. The body uses a combination of carbohydrates (glucose and glycogen), fats, and to a lesser extent, protein for fuel. The proportion of each fuel source depends on several factors including exercise intensity, duration, fitness level, and nutritional state.

In a fasted state, with glycogen stores partially depleted, the body increases lipolysis and fat oxidation. This has led to the hypothesis that fasted cardio results in greater fat loss over time. However, using more fat as fuel during a workout does not necessarily mean more total body fat is lost in the long term (Horowitz et al., 1999).

Does Fasted Cardio Burn More Fat?

Several studies have explored the acute effects of fasted versus fed cardio on fat oxidation. For example, a study by Paoli et al. (2011) found that fat oxidation was significantly higher during fasted exercise compared to fed exercise in young healthy men. Another study by Schoenfeld et al. (2014) investigated whether this increase in fat oxidation translates into greater fat loss. They conducted a randomized trial with 20 female participants who were assigned to either a fasted or fed cardio group over 4 weeks. Both groups consumed the same number of calories and followed the same training program. The study found no significant difference in fat loss between the two groups.

Source: Courtesy of CrossFit Inc.

This suggests that while fasted cardio may temporarily increase fat utilization during exercise, this does not necessarily result in greater fat loss when total daily energy expenditure and intake are controlled.

Hormonal Impacts and Muscle Loss Risk

Fasted cardio can influence hormone levels. During fasting, insulin is low and catecholamines like epinephrine and norepinephrine are elevated, which can promote lipolysis (fat breakdown) (Klein et al., 1993). However, prolonged fasting combined with cardio, especially at high intensities, can increase cortisol levels, a catabolic hormone associated with muscle breakdown.

Without adequate protein or energy intake prior to exercise, the risk of muscle catabolism increases. This is particularly relevant for lean individuals or those seeking to preserve muscle mass during fat loss. Research by Areta et al. (2014) emphasizes the importance of nutrient timing in maximizing muscle protein synthesis. While cardio doesn’t require the same anabolic signaling as resistance training, repeated fasted sessions without proper nutrition could have cumulative negative effects on muscle retention.

Performance Considerations

Training in a fed state can improve exercise performance. Studies have shown that glycogen availability directly impacts endurance and high-intensity performance (Coyle et al., 1986). Exercising in a fed state may allow individuals to work harder or for longer durations, increasing total caloric burn and potentially improving body composition outcomes.

Furthermore, low blood glucose levels during fasted cardio may lead to early fatigue, light-headedness, or decreased motivation, especially in longer or more intense sessions. This can reduce workout quality and consistency over time.

Long-Term Fat Loss: What Does the Evidence Say?

When it comes to long-term fat loss, the body of evidence suggests that the total caloric deficit created through diet and exercise is far more important than the timing of nutrient intake relative to cardio. In a review by Hackett and Hagstrom (2017), it was concluded that there is no strong evidence to support that fasted cardio leads to greater fat loss compared to fed cardio when total energy balance is matched.

amrap chest workoutsSource: Courtesy of CrossFit Inc.

Similarly, a meta-analysis by Vieira et al. (2016) evaluated the effects of fasted versus fed cardio and found no significant differences in body composition outcomes between the two approaches. The authors emphasized that adherence, total energy expenditure, and individual preference play a more critical role in fat loss.

Practical Implications and Individual Variability

While fasted cardio may offer slight increases in fat oxidation, the practical implications are minimal if total energy balance is controlled. Individual preference, lifestyle, and workout consistency are more crucial factors. Some people may feel more energized and perform better after eating, while others may find fasted cardio convenient or mentally beneficial.

For individuals practicing intermittent fasting or with morning time constraints, fasted cardio might be a practical option. However, for athletes or those engaging in high-intensity interval training (HIIT), eating beforehand could improve performance and recovery.

Ultimately, the most effective cardio strategy for fat loss is the one that fits consistently into your routine, allows for adequate performance, and supports overall caloric control.

Conclusion

The debate between fasted and fed cardio has persisted for years, but current scientific evidence does not support a significant advantage of one over the other in terms of long-term fat loss. While fasted cardio can increase fat oxidation during exercise, this does not necessarily lead to greater fat loss. Key factors such as total caloric intake, workout intensity, consistency, and individual preference are more important determinants of fat loss outcomes. The best approach is the one that aligns with your lifestyle, enhances performance, and promotes adherence over time.

Key Takeaways Table

Key Point Fasted Cardio Fed Cardio
Fat Oxidation During Exercise Higher Lower
Performance May be reduced Typically better
Muscle Preservation Risk of catabolism if prolonged More protective due to nutrient availability
Hormonal Response Elevated catecholamines, possible cortisol increase Stable insulin, improved performance
Fat Loss Outcome (Long-Term) No significant advantage No significant advantage
Best For Convenience, low-intensity sessions High-intensity sessions, performance focus

References

Areta, J.L., Burke, L.M., Ross, M.L., Camera, D.M., West, D.W.D., Broad, E.M., Jeacocke, N.A., Moore, D.R., Stellingwerff, T. and Phillips, S.M. (2014) ‘Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise alters myofibrillar protein synthesis’, The Journal of Physiology, 592(23), pp. 5471–5484.

Coyle, E.F., Coggan, A.R., Hopper, M.K. and Walters, T.J. (1986) ‘Determinants of endurance in well-trained cyclists’, Journal of Applied Physiology, 61(2), pp. 958–963.

Hackett, D.A. and Hagstrom, A.D. (2017) ‘Effect of fasted vs fed state on aerobic exercise-induced fat loss: a meta-analysis’, Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 2(4), p. 43.

Horowitz, J.F., Mora-Rodriguez, R., Byerley, L.O. and Coyle, E.F. (1999) ‘Lipolytic suppression following carbohydrate ingestion limits fat oxidation during exercise’, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 276(4), pp. E768–E775.

Klein, S., Coyle, E.F. and Wolfe, R.R. (1993) ‘Fat metabolism during low-intensity exercise in endurance-trained and untrained men’, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 267(6), pp. E934–E940.

Paoli, A., Marcolin, G., Zonin, F., Neri, M., Sivieri, A. and Pacelli, Q.F. (2011) ‘Exercising fasting or fed to enhance fat loss? Influence of food intake on respiratory ratio and excess postexercise oxygen consumption after a bout of endurance training’, International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 21(1), pp. 48–54.

Schoenfeld, B.J., Aragon, A.A., Wilborn, C.D., Krieger, J.W. and Sonmez, G.T. (2014) ‘Body composition changes associated with fasted versus non-fasted aerobic exercise’, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11(1), p. 54.

Vieira, A.F., Costa, R.R., Macedo, R.C.O., Coconcelli, L. and Kruel, L.F.M. (2016) ‘Effects of aerobic exercise performed in fasted vs. fed state on fat and carbohydrate metabolism in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 26(5), pp. 483–494.

Was this article helpful?

Source link: https://www.boxrox.com/fasted-cardio-vs-fed-cardio-whats-more-effective-for-fat-loss/ by Robbie Wild Hudson at www.boxrox.com