Cardio or Weights for Fat Loss? The Final Verdict

When it comes to fat loss, the debate between cardio and resistance training (weights) has persisted for decades. While both are effective tools for improving body composition, health and performance, the question remains: which is superior for fat loss? This article provides an in-depth, evidence-based comparison between cardiovascular exercise and weight training to determine the most effective strategy for reducing body fat.

Defining Fat Loss

Fat loss refers to the reduction of adipose tissue in the body. It is primarily governed by energy balance: the relationship between calories consumed and calories expended. A caloric deficit, in which energy expenditure exceeds energy intake, is essential for fat loss (Hall et al., 2012). Exercise contributes to fat loss by increasing energy expenditure and affecting hormones that influence metabolism and appetite.

Caloric Burn and Energy Expenditure

Cardiovascular exercises such as running, cycling and rowing generally burn more calories per session compared to weight training. For instance, Harvard Medical School (2021) reports that a 70 kg person burns approximately 372 kcal in 30 minutes of running at 9.7 km/h, while the same person burns around 223 kcal during 30 minutes of vigorous weight training. This suggests that, on a per-session basis, cardio leads to higher immediate caloric expenditure.

However, weight training stimulates excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), often called the “afterburn” effect. EPOC can increase resting metabolic rate for hours post-exercise. Research by Schuenke et al. (2002) found that metabolism remained elevated for up to 38 hours following a high-intensity resistance training session. Although the total additional calorie burn is modest, it adds up over time.

Lean Muscle Mass and Basal Metabolic Rate

One significant advantage of weight training is its effect on lean muscle mass. Resistance training promotes muscle hypertrophy, which in turn raises basal metabolic rate (BMR)—the number of calories the body burns at rest. Wolfe (2006) estimated that each kilogram of muscle burns approximately 13 kcal/day at rest, compared to only about 4.5 kcal/day for fat. Therefore, more muscle mass equates to a higher BMR and greater daily energy expenditure.

Cardio does not promote muscle growth to the same extent and, in some cases, excessive cardio may lead to muscle catabolism, especially if performed in a caloric deficit without adequate protein intake (Areta et al., 2014). Thus, while cardio may burn more calories in a single session, weight training supports sustained increases in calorie burn through muscle maintenance and growth.

Fat Loss Efficiency in Research

Several studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of cardio and weights for fat loss. A meta-analysis by Schoenfeld et al. (2014) concluded that combining resistance training with aerobic exercise leads to greater fat mass reductions than either modality alone. Furthermore, a study by Willis et al. (2012) compared aerobic training, resistance training and a combination of both in overweight individuals. The combined group lost more total fat mass and improved lean mass retention better than those who performed only cardio.

Source: Photo courtesy of CrossFit Inc.

Another study by Swift et al. (2018) found that while aerobic training is effective for reducing fat mass, resistance training is superior for preserving lean mass during weight loss. This is critical, as lean mass preservation enhances metabolic health and improves long-term weight management.

Hormonal and Metabolic Effects

Both cardio and weight training influence hormones associated with fat loss. Cardiovascular exercise improves insulin sensitivity and increases lipolysis, the breakdown of fat for energy (Richards et al., 2010). High-intensity cardio, particularly high-intensity interval training (HIIT), elevates catecholamines such as adrenaline and noradrenaline, which stimulate fat oxidation (Boutcher, 2011).

Weight training also increases insulin sensitivity and boosts anabolic hormones such as testosterone and growth hormone, which aid in muscle retention and fat metabolism (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2005). Additionally, resistance training reduces cortisol levels over time, which is beneficial as chronic cortisol elevation is linked to abdominal fat accumulation (Epel et al., 2000).

Appetite Regulation and Nutritional Adherence

Exercise impacts appetite and food intake differently. Cardio can lead to increased hunger in some individuals, particularly long-duration, steady-state cardio (King et al., 2009). This may make it more challenging to maintain a calorie deficit if dietary intake increases post-exercise.

Weight training appears to have a more neutral or even appetite-suppressing effect in certain contexts. A study by Broom et al. (2009) found that resistance exercise reduced levels of the hunger hormone ghrelin and increased levels of peptide YY, a satiety hormone. This suggests that weight training may provide an advantage in controlling hunger, thereby improving adherence to dietary goals.

Long-Term Sustainability and Adherence

Sustainability is crucial for long-term fat loss. A programme that is enjoyable and manageable over the long term is more effective than a theoretically superior method that cannot be maintained. Adherence rates to exercise are often higher when individuals enjoy the activity and see progress.

Many people find resistance training empowering and motivating due to measurable strength gains and aesthetic changes. Moreover, resistance training can be adapted to different fitness levels and goals, making it versatile and accessible.

While cardio can be engaging—particularly in group formats like spin classes or dance workouts—it may lead to diminishing returns if overused without variation. Additionally, individuals relying solely on cardio may risk lean mass loss if not supported by strength training and sufficient protein intake.

Body Recomposition: Losing Fat and Gaining Muscle

Body recomposition—the process of losing fat while gaining muscle—is more achievable through resistance training, especially when combined with a high-protein diet. A study by Longland et al. (2016) demonstrated that overweight young men who engaged in resistance training and consumed a high-protein diet lost significantly more fat and gained more muscle compared to those who did cardio or consumed lower protein.

Cardio alone is less effective at promoting muscle gain. Therefore, individuals aiming for a lean, muscular physique benefit more from incorporating resistance training into their routine.

Practical Application: Combining Both Modalities

While each modality offers unique benefits, the evidence strongly supports a combined approach for optimal fat loss and body composition. Integrating both cardio and resistance training enables individuals to maximise fat burning, preserve lean mass and improve cardiovascular and metabolic health.

Guidelines suggest performing at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week, along with two or more sessions of strength training targeting all major muscle groups (Piercy et al., 2018). HIIT can be an efficient way to combine elements of both cardio and resistance training within the same session.

Final Verdict

While cardiovascular exercise burns more calories during individual sessions and improves heart health, resistance training builds lean muscle, increases resting metabolism and enhances long-term fat loss sustainability. For most people, the best strategy for fat loss is not an either/or decision but a balanced combination of both.

Bibliography

Areta, J.L., Burke, L.M., Ross, M.L., Camera, D.M., West, D.W., Broad, E.M., Jeacocke, N.A., Moore, D.R., Stellingwerff, T. and Phillips, S.M., 2014. Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise alters myofibrillar protein synthesis. Journal of Physiology, 592(23), pp.5559-5573.

Boutcher, S.H., 2011. High-intensity intermittent exercise and fat loss. Journal of Obesity, 2011, pp.1-10.

Broom, D.R., Stensel, D.J., Bishop, N.C., Burns, S.F. and Miyashita, M., 2009. Exercise-induced suppression of acylated ghrelin in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 102(6), pp.2165-2171.

Epel, E., Lapidus, R., McEwen, B. and Brownell, K., 2000. Stress may add bite to appetite in women: a laboratory study of stress-induced cortisol and eating behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 26(1), pp.37-49.

Hall, K.D., Heymsfield, S.B., Kemnitz, J.W., Klein, S., Schoeller, D.A. and Speakman, J.R., 2012. Energy balance and its components: implications for body weight regulation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(4), pp.989-994.

Harvard Medical School, 2021. Calories burned in 30 minutes for people of three different weights. [online] Available at: https://www.health.harvard.edu/diet-and-weight-loss/calories-burned-in-30-minutes-of-leisure-and-routine-activities [Accessed 2 Apr. 2025].

King, N.A., Hopkins, M., Caudwell, P., Stubbs, R.J. and Blundell, J.E., 2009. Individual variability following 12 weeks of supervised exercise: identification and characterization of compensation for exercise-induced weight loss. International Journal of Obesity, 32(1), pp.177-184.

Kraemer, W.J. and Ratamess, N.A., 2005. Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Medicine, 35(4), pp.339-361.

Longland, T.M., Oikawa, S.Y., Mitchell, C.J., Devries, M.C. and Phillips, S.M., 2016. Higher compared with lower dietary protein during an energy deficit combined with intense exercise promotes greater lean mass gain and fat mass loss: a randomised trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103(3), pp.738-746.

Piercy, K.L., Troiano, R.P., Ballard, R.M., Carlson, S.A., Fulton, J.E., Galuska, D.A., George, S.M. and Olson, R.D., 2018. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA, 320(19), pp.2020-2028.

Richards, J.C., Johnson, T.K., Kuzma, J.N., Lonac, M.C., Schweder, M.M., Voyles, W.F. and Bell, C., 2010. Short-term sprint interval training increases insulin sensitivity in healthy adults but does not affect the thermogenic response to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Journal of Physiology, 588(15), pp.2961-2972.

Schoenfeld, B.J., Aragon, A.A. and Krieger, J.W., 2014. Effects of resistance training frequency on measures of muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 45(4), pp.577-585.

Schuenke, M.D., Mikat, R.P. and McBride, J.M., 2002. Effect of an acute period of resistance exercise on excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: implications for body mass management. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 86(5), pp.411-417.

Swift, D.L., Johannsen, N.M., Lavie, C.J., Earnest, C.P. and Church, T.S., 2018. The role of exercise and physical activity in weight loss and maintenance. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 61(2), pp.206-213.

Willis, L.H., Slentz, C.A., Bateman, L.A., Shields, A.T., Piner, L.W., Bales, C.W., Houmard, J.A. and Kraus, W.E., 2012. Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults. Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(12), pp.1831-1837.

Wolfe, R.R., 2006. The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84(3), pp.475-482.

Was this article helpful?